![]() A civilization is thus the highest cultural grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural identity people have short of that which distinguishes humans from other species. Arabs, Chinese and Westerners, however, are not part of any broader cultural entity. European communities, in turn, will share cultural features that distinguish them from Arab or Chinese communities. The culture of a village in southern Italy may be different from that of a village in northern Italy, but both will share in a common Italian culture that distinguishes them from German villages. Villages, regions, ethnic groups, nationalities, religious groups, all have distinct cultures at different levels of cultural heterogeneity. What do we mean when we talk of a civilization? A civilization is a cultural entity. It is far more meaningful now to group countries not in terms of their political or economic systems or in terms of their level of economic development but rather in terms of their culture and civilization. In the politics of civilizations, the peoples and governments of non-Western civilizations no longer remain the objects of history as targets of Western colonialism but join the West as movers and shapers of history.ĭuring the cold war the world was divided into the First, Second and Third Worlds. With the end of the Cold War, international politics moves out of its Western phase, and its center- piece becomes the interaction between the West and non-Western civilizations and among non-Western civilizations. This was as true of the Cold War as it was of the world wars and the earlier wars of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. These conflicts between princes, nation states and ideologies were primarily conflicts within Western civilization, “Western civil wars,” as William Lind has labeled them. During the Cold War, this latter conflict became embodied in the struggle between the two superpowers, neither of which was a nation state in the classical European sense and each of which defined its identity in terms of its ideology. Then, as a result of the Russian Revolution and the reaction against it, the conflict of nations yielded to the conflict of ideologies, first among communism, fascism-Nazism and liberal democracy, and then between communism and liberal democracy. Palmer put it, “The wars of kings were over the wars of peoples had begun.” This nineteenth- century pattern lasted until the end of World War 1. In the process they created nation states, and beginning with the French Revolution the principal lines of conflict were between nations rather than princes. For a century and a half after the emergence of the modern international system with the Peace of Westphalia, the conflicts of the Western world were largely among princes-emperors, absolute monarchs and constitutional monarchs attempting to expand their bureaucracies, their armies, their mercantilist economic strength and, most important, the territory they ruled. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future.Ĭonflict between civilizations will be the latest phase in the evolution of conflict in the modern world. ![]() The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. Nation states will remain the most powerful actors in world affairs, but the principal conflicts of global politics will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural. It is my hypothesis that the fundamental source of conflict in this new world will not be primarily ideological or primarily economic. Yet they all miss a crucial, indeed a central, aspect of what global politics is likely to be in the coming years. Each of these visions catches aspects of the emerging reality. World politics is entering a new phase, and intellectuals have not hesitated to proliferate visions of what it will be-the end of history, the return of traditional rivalries between nation states, and the decline of the nation state from the conflicting pulls of tribalism and globalism, among others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |